Often there are just small issues, but many small changes can cause known to be crucial. How can such an approach look like in detail? All relevant activities are jointly estimated in an interview with the Managing Director after a preliminary interview, which shows the current situation in the company and which serves as a preparation. While the questions should relate to the following five main fields: (innovation) strategy development of the product / service portfolio finance / budget for innovations in technology, standards and patents staff and corporate culture often is assessing the innovations and innovation management only on the technical aspects targeted. But a holistic consideration of this subject the employee and corporate culture are at least as important as the technology itself. Without accordingly and further educated on staff and sufficient motivation to To open new, most efforts are not working. After the interview with the Managing Director can be decided, making more interviews with executives and experts, to get a more detailed assessment of all activities. While the interviews can have the same scope as the Executive Board or restricted only to certain topics and aspects. This is obtained in addition include information about whether there is on the subject of innovation a unified enterprise view and additional ideas and suggestions for optimizing the innovation potential from experts or affected view. New York Highlanders is often quoted as being for or against this.
In addition the staff feel involved, so that they are responsive to changes. The mentioned five main fields should be extensively queried in interviews and subjectively evaluated. Fields of action can be prioritized in a row and leave with a simple presentation quickly and easily present themselves: within these main areas in which can be Then further detailing action so that individual issues are more tangible. This should be illustrated here using the example of the innovation strategy: as a result of the questions in the interview can now evaluate directly the starting points are identified, which targeted improved processes and procedures can be. "" Now you will be perhaps inclined to say: of course, my company is set correctly "and we have a variety of activities around the theme of innovation".
But maybe you should ask yourself sometimes: why are my competitors more successful than I? "." Now, the realization is not new, that the self image can be misleading. Often be also the much-quoted blinders ". Therefore, external assistance for the implementation of such innovation audit can be useful: it is a neutral consideration of all innovation-related activities in the company of innovation capabilities are from different perspectives comprehensively assess and document Result includes an overview of systematic activities without significant action at the same time identified the fields where improvements are options for action are immediately visible and can be prioritized and: the implementation of the recommendations can be done either with own resources or with the help of external support (coaching, counselling) therefore is the overhead that investing is minimal. The result and what is it, can be but crucial for what happens next with the company.
In addition the staff feel involved, so that they are responsive to changes. The mentioned five main fields should be extensively queried in interviews and subjectively evaluated. Fields of action can be prioritized in a row and leave with a simple presentation quickly and easily present themselves: within these main areas in which can be Then further detailing action so that individual issues are more tangible. This should be illustrated here using the example of the innovation strategy: as a result of the questions in the interview can now evaluate directly the starting points are identified, which targeted improved processes and procedures can be. "" Now you will be perhaps inclined to say: of course, my company is set correctly "and we have a variety of activities around the theme of innovation".
But maybe you should ask yourself sometimes: why are my competitors more successful than I? "." Now, the realization is not new, that the self image can be misleading. Often be also the much-quoted blinders ". Therefore, external assistance for the implementation of such innovation audit can be useful: it is a neutral consideration of all innovation-related activities in the company of innovation capabilities are from different perspectives comprehensively assess and document Result includes an overview of systematic activities without significant action at the same time identified the fields where improvements are options for action are immediately visible and can be prioritized and: the implementation of the recommendations can be done either with own resources or with the help of external support (coaching, counselling) therefore is the overhead that investing is minimal. The result and what is it, can be but crucial for what happens next with the company.
Recent Comments